Cash Plus remains an NCB customer
By deshoda • Jan 18th, 2008 • Category: FeaturesAn injunction, in relation to the nine accounts, is to remain in force until the matter returns to the Supreme Court on January 24. Cash Plus will then apply for the injunction to be extended until the trial.
NCB had filed an appeal seeking to have the injunction discharged in respect of the 26 accounts, but was only successful in having the appeal allowed in part.
Attorney-at-law Dave Garcia, general manager of general counsel and special projects at NCB, said while the bank had hoped the injunction would have been discharged entirely, they were “very pleased, especially with the direction that the matter is to proceed on January 24″.
The Court of Appeal directed the Supreme Court to hear the application for the interlocutory injunction on January 24. The court said further that the hearing was to proceed even if the claim which Cash Plus had brought against the Financial Services Commission (FSC) had not been been determined.
The suit, which Cash Plus has brought against the FSC, was heard in part last year, for continuation on January 23 in the Supreme Court.
Cash Plus is asking the court to determine whether the nature of its business requires it to be registered under the Securities Act. On December 28, the FSC issued a cease-and-desist order on Cash Plus, which is appealing the order.
In discharging the injunction yesterday, in respect of the 17 accounts for affiliated companies of Cash Plus, the Court of Appeal said those companies had not filed suits and there was no ostensible authority from them to enable Cash Plus to act on their behalf.
Source: Jamaica Gleaner | Published January 18, 2008
Related Links:
Attorneys for Cash Plus back in court to fight FSC order
NCB to close several Cash Plus accounts
deshoda is Sadly, I am seen as something of a simpleton with sacks of simple, sordid suggestions and statements. The stigma served to me is something short of spectacular and somewhat stimulating. I shall be stoic and shrug off all stultification and stand solid, sustaining my simple speech so as to stay sincere to self. Someone sufficiently smart to substantiate something somewhat substandard should not speak sparingly. This sojourn into my subconscious is meant specifically to sensitize the segregated segment of society specified by their synthesis. In summation i am simply scripting this synopsis to show how splendid it is to scribble seemingly shoddy shite.
Email this author | All posts by deshoda
